-
Alario v. Knudsen: Montana’s TikTok ban is unconstitutional
Montana Senate Bill 419 is an unconstitutional ban on free expression that triggers the most exacting scrutiny under the First Amendment.
-
Eidson v. South Carolina: School choice program is designed to provide new opportunities to all eligible families
School choice— like South Carolina’s ESTF program—is a tool to provide children equal access to education while recognizing that all children learn in unique ways.
-
Hopkins v. Watson: Mississippi’s lifetime disenfranchisement scheme should be invalidated
Mississippi’s mandatory, irrevocable, lifetime disenfranchisement scheme, rooted in noxious racism, and unique in its arbitrariness and severity, is cruel and unusual.
-
Moody v. NetChoice, Paxton v. NetChoice: Florida and Texas statutes violate the First Amendment
The laws regulating social media platforms in these cases interfere with protected editorial discretion and compel dissemination of unwanted third-party speech in violation of the First Amendment.
-
Amicus Brief: Quinn v. Washington
The constitution imposes territorial limits on state taxes to ensure a dynamic and competitive interstate economy.
-
National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association v. Black
The structure of the Authority violates the separation of powers because the members of the Authority, although Officers, are not appointed with presidential nomination and Senate confirmation, as the Appointments Clause requires.
-
Brooke Henderson, et al. v. School District of Springfield R-12, et al.
To avoid hollowing out both section 1983 and section 1988, this court should reverse the district court’s order.
-
Amicus Brief: Roberts v. McDonald
The Supreme Court should take the case because "race-based distribution of antiviral treatments is plainly unconstitutional."
-
Amicus Brief: Memmer v. United States
The government’s argument would put landowners in a Trails Act-limbo where the government has denied them use and possession of their land but the owners are not entitled to compensation unless and until the railroad and trail-sponsor reach a trail-use agreement.
-
Amicus Brief: Gonzalez v. Google
For nearly three decades, Section 230 has served as the backbone of the Internet, precisely as Congress correctly anticipated and intended.
-
Amicus Brief: Association Des Éleveurs De Canards Et D’oies Du Québec v. Rob Bonta
Section 25982 of the California Health and Safety Code prohibits the sale in California of a wholesome food ingredient in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause and poses a grave challenge to the future of food and agriculture in the U.S.
-
Amicus Brief: Ariyan Incorporated v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
The Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans took private property from seventy owners.
-
Snitko v. United States
Reason respectfully urges the Court to permit the public filing of the deposition transcripts and reject any effort to hide them from the media or the public.
-
Amicus Brief: SEC v. Romeril
The condition that the Securities & Exchange Commission imposed on Barry Romeril’s settlement of its claims infringes on the First Amendment rights of all who wish to hear Romeril’s story.
-
Amicus Brief: McDonald v. Firth
Subjecting mandatory bar associations to “the same constitutional rule” as public sector unions now means subjecting them to exacting scrutiny that reveals unjustifiable violations of attorneys’ First Amendment rights by the bar associations.
-
Amicus Brief: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits the government from denying “any person . . . the equal protection of the laws.”
-
Amicus Brief: John K. Maciver Institute For Public Policy v. Tony Evers
The Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of the press does not assume that the press will be “objective,” and to allow the government power to draw legal lines around the press based on the government’s determination of “objectivity” is unworkable in principle.